Skip to content
Home » Editorial Policy

Editorial Policy

Our Editorial Mission

Local search optimization attracts bad advice. Fake clicks. Bot traffic. Suspended profiles. We built this site to document what actually drives Google Business Profile engagement. Our mission is simple. We test CTR strategies, document the data, and publish the exact steps.

Three years of testing. Zero shortcuts. Real results.

We serve agency owners and local business operators who need signal over noise. You won’t find generic summaries here. We only publish methods we personally verify on live client accounts.

How We Choose Topics

We don’t write articles to fill a content calendar. We choose topics based on operational friction. If a Google update tanks map pack rankings, we investigate the cause. If a new tool claims to automate driving directions, we buy it and run a baseline test.

We pull ideas from three specific places. Client campaigns, reader emails, and raw SERP volatility.

We ignore theoretical SEO debates. If we can’t test a concept on a live Google Business Profile, we refuse to cover it. You need actionable tactics to increase visibility, not academic discussions.

Research and Fact-Checking Standards

Theory gets businesses suspended.

We demand proof. Before we publish a guide on primary category selection or sub-category optimization, we run it through live profiles. We use tools like GMB Everywhere to scrape the exact categories top-ranking competitors use. We verify every single claim. If a software vendor promises a ranking boost from daily posting, we test that exact frequency for thirty days.

We track the indirect engagement signals. Clicks. Views. Actions.

If the data fails to support the claim, we call the vendor out. We don’t publish regurgitated Google guidelines. We publish field notes from actual local SEO campaigns.

Corrections Policy

We get things wrong. Google changes the rules without warning. When an algorithm update invalidates our past advice, we fix the content immediately.

If you spot a factual error in our testing data, email [email protected]. We review all claims within 48 hours. If you’re right, we update the page. We place a visible correction notice at the top of the article detailing exactly what changed and when.

Transparency builds trust.

Hiding mistakes destroys your credibility. We prefer to own our errors publicly.

Affiliate and Commercial Relationships

Running live CTR tests costs money. We fund this site through affiliate partnerships and our own Local Engagement Booster service. If you click a link to a tracking tool and buy it, we earn a commission.

This financial reality never dictates our recommendations. We reject most affiliate offers we receive. If a CTR bot network offers us a massive payout, we decline the deal. We only recommend tools we actively install on our own client profiles.

You’ll always see a clear disclosure at the top of any monetized page. We don’t hide our revenue streams.

Editorial Independence

Nobody buys a positive review here. Software vendors can’t pay for placement. Agencies can’t sponsor our case studies.

Our editorial team operates in total isolation from our revenue channels. If a tool we promote pushes a bad update, we rewrite our review to reflect the downgrade. We owe our loyalty to the local SEO practitioner reading the site. We owe nothing to the software developers.

Content Updates and Freshness

Local search decays fast. A tactic that dominated the map pack in January will trigger a suspension in November. We audit our core guides every 90 days to prevent blind spots.

We check every screenshot. We verify every link. We rerun the engagement tests.

If a strategy stops driving profile views or direction requests, we archive the post or rewrite it with current data. Look at the updated date on our articles. That isn’t a fake timestamp. That’s the exact day we verified the method still works.